<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OLIVER STONE RESPONDS TO ATTACK FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES&#8217; LARRY ROHTER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://southoftheborderdoc.com/oliver-stone-responds-to-attack-from-the-new-york-times-larry-rohter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://southoftheborderdoc.com/oliver-stone-responds-to-attack-from-the-new-york-times-larry-rohter/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=oliver-stone-responds-to-attack-from-the-new-york-times-larry-rohter</link>
	<description>a film by Oliver Stone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Movies &#124; Reviews &#124; Movie Times &#124; Hollywood News &#124; &#124; Movie Reviews &#124; New Film Reviews</title>
		<link>http://southoftheborderdoc.com/oliver-stone-responds-to-attack-from-the-new-york-times-larry-rohter/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Movies &#124; Reviews &#124; Movie Times &#124; Hollywood News &#124; &#124; Movie Reviews &#124; New Film Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southoftheborderdoc.com/?p=477#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] Larry Rohter&#8217;s frontal assault on the film took up most of the front page of the New York Times&#8216;s Arts section, stating that the film is &#8220;plagued by … issues of accuracy&#8221;. However, he failed to find any factual errors in the film – despite some rather desperate attempts. In one such foray he used data on oil imports from 2004-2010 to try to refute an oil industry analyst who appears in a TV clip in the film, in April 2002. The whole five-second soundbite had no relevance to the film in any case, but Rohter still got it wrong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Larry Rohter&#8217;s frontal assault on the film took up most of the front page of the New York Times&#8216;s Arts section, stating that the film is &#8220;plagued by … issues of accuracy&#8221;. However, he failed to find any factual errors in the film – despite some rather desperate attempts. In one such foray he used data on oil imports from 2004-2010 to try to refute an oil industry analyst who appears in a TV clip in the film, in April 2002. The whole five-second soundbite had no relevance to the film in any case, but Rohter still got it wrong. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: South of the Border: reviewing the reviewers &#124; Mark Weisbrot &#124; Worldwide News</title>
		<link>http://southoftheborderdoc.com/oliver-stone-responds-to-attack-from-the-new-york-times-larry-rohter/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>South of the Border: reviewing the reviewers &#124; Mark Weisbrot &#124; Worldwide News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southoftheborderdoc.com/?p=477#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] Larry Rohter&#8217;s frontal assault on the film took up most of the front page of the New York Times&#8216;s Arts section, stating that the film is &#8220;plagued by … issues of accuracy&#8221;. However, he failed to find any factual errors in the film – despite some rather desperate attempts. In one such foray he used data on oil imports from 2004-2010 to try to refute an oil industry analyst who appears in a TV clip in the film, in April 2002. The whole five-second soundbite had no relevance to the film in any case, but Rohter still got it wrong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Larry Rohter&#8217;s frontal assault on the film took up most of the front page of the New York Times&#8216;s Arts section, stating that the film is &#8220;plagued by … issues of accuracy&#8221;. However, he failed to find any factual errors in the film – despite some rather desperate attempts. In one such foray he used data on oil imports from 2004-2010 to try to refute an oil industry analyst who appears in a TV clip in the film, in April 2002. The whole five-second soundbite had no relevance to the film in any case, but Rohter still got it wrong. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Larry Rohter Responds on South of the Border</title>
		<link>http://southoftheborderdoc.com/oliver-stone-responds-to-attack-from-the-new-york-times-larry-rohter/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Larry Rohter Responds on South of the Border</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southoftheborderdoc.com/?p=477#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] new film South of the Border. So Stone and the film&#039;s co-writers Mark Weisbrot and Tariq Ali wrote a devastating rebuttal. A reader passed along a link to that piece to Rohter, suggesting that he &quot;should be embarrassed&quot; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new film South of the Border. So Stone and the film&#39;s co-writers Mark Weisbrot and Tariq Ali wrote a devastating rebuttal. A reader passed along a link to that piece to Rohter, suggesting that he &quot;should be embarrassed&quot; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NYT Reporter, Playing Film Critic, Pans Film About Himself</title>
		<link>http://southoftheborderdoc.com/oliver-stone-responds-to-attack-from-the-new-york-times-larry-rohter/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIR Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NYT Reporter, Playing Film Critic, Pans Film About Himself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://southoftheborderdoc.com/?p=477#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] Weisbrot and Ali have written a letter to the Times responding to the review. They point out that even some of the more mundane criticisms of the film [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Weisbrot and Ali have written a letter to the Times responding to the review. They point out that even some of the more mundane criticisms of the film [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

